Jun 16, 2:49:57PM @: we really do desperately need new blood
Jun 16, 2:50:05PM @: conversations have all been done
Jun 16, 2:51:51PM mistawook@gmail.com: Well, we know where we stand with one another, or at least we assume we do.
Jun 16, 2:52:04PM @: and therein lies the problem
Jun 16, 2:52:22PM mistawook@gmail.com: I just don't think people put much effort into the whole thing near the end
Jun 16, 2:52:32PM @: no, they didn't
Jun 16, 2:52:43PM @: but they sure did pitch a fit when it went down
Jun 16, 2:53:24PM mistawook@gmail.com: Yes
Jun 16, 2:53:58PM mistawook@gmail.com: The only thing that would draw in new people at this point is some kind of front-end content like a home page
Jun 16, 2:54:14PM mistawook@gmail.com: The forum needs to be wrapped around site that actually has stuff people are interested in
Jun 16, 2:54:19PM @: yes
Jun 16, 2:54:27PM @: absolutely
Jun 16, 2:54:30PM mistawook@gmail.com: and while there have been attempts, it's mostly based on what was on the forums
Jun 16, 2:54:56PM @: but nobody seems to be able to agree what that FP content should be
Jun 16, 2:55:44PM mistawook@gmail.com: Yeah, we're kind of working backwards here
Jun 16, 2:55:49PM @: very
Jun 16, 2:56:14PM @: i've been racking my brain trying to figure out what we can put up there
Jun 16, 2:56:31PM mistawook@gmail.com: It can't just be an art/design portal as there are already tons of those
Jun 16, 2:56:57PM mistawook@gmail.com: blogs are pointless
Jun 16, 2:57:11PM mistawook@gmail.com: unless people really want to invest the time to write something decent
Jun 16, 2:59:07PM mistawook@gmail.com: In either case, there'd need to be some backlog of content, so that the front-page isn't barren
Jun 16, 2:59:14PM mistawook@gmail.com: And I don't know where that stuff would come from
Jun 16, 3:00:04PM @: i think a huge issue is that there are tons of niche sites out there, and there's already TONS of re-blogging
Jun 16, 3:00:23PM @: that is, taking what 5 other blogs already said about your niche and putting them on your site
Jun 16, 3:00:42PM mistawook@gmail.com: Ew, web 2.0
Jun 16, 3:00:49PM @: so even if it were a sort of "everything we think is cool" kind of thing
Jun 16, 3:01:21PM mistawook@gmail.com: Nah, unique content should be our goal, and then distributing through the usual means is what comes after
Jun 16, 3:01:22PM @: it's still not a huge draw, cuz there will already be like 5 thousand of those exact same things
Jun 16, 3:01:36PM @: right, but what is unique
Jun 16, 3:01:38PM mistawook@gmail.com: True
Jun 16, 3:01:42PM @: other than what we make ourselves
Jun 16, 3:01:53PM @: which is art/writing/something creative
Jun 16, 3:01:59PM mistawook@gmail.com: That's what boggles my mind about something like the Something Awful Forums with it's 100,000 active members
Jun 16, 3:02:07PM mistawook@gmail.com: Eh
Jun 16, 3:02:16PM mistawook@gmail.com: I guess community content is fine
Jun 16, 3:02:22PM mistawook@gmail.com: it just needs to presented well
Jun 16, 3:02:29PM @: something awful has had an audience for like 10 years
Jun 16, 3:02:35PM mistawook@gmail.com: All of our old homepages were kind of weak in that regard
Jun 16, 3:02:39PM @: yes they were
Jun 16, 3:02:45PM @: but that's the thing
Jun 16, 3:02:53PM mistawook@gmail.com: Well, also throw in the fact that it costs SA members money to join
Jun 16, 3:03:01PM @: why 10 different home pages
Jun 16, 3:03:06PM @: why not one
Jun 16, 3:03:18PM mistawook@gmail.com: Bad direction?
Jun 16, 3:03:57PM @: well then one with one person editing? bu
Jun 16, 3:04:05PM @: but then who decides who gets to edit?
Jun 16, 3:04:10PM @: and who has time for it
Jun 16, 3:04:31PM @: who will actually put in the effort
Jun 16, 3:04:39PM mistawook@gmail.com: We could integrate a content management system or other back-end tool, choose editors for each section
Jun 16, 3:04:40PM @: and then who will put in the effort to make content
Jun 16, 3:04:55PM mistawook@gmail.com: Then it's a matter of other people coming up with content, and then having trusted members just pushing "OK"
Jun 16, 3:05:07PM mistawook@gmail.com: You only get out of it what you put in
Jun 16, 3:05:11PM @: right, but nobody comes up with content
Jun 16, 3:05:23PM mistawook@gmail.com: We do, just nobody wants to share
Jun 16, 3:05:24PM @: they all say "good idea" and then stick their thumb up their ass
Jun 16, 3:05:33PM @: except sniser
Jun 16, 3:05:45PM @: who has no filter and just throws EVERYTHING up
Jun 16, 3:06:44PM @: well then we all put content up, someone can be the "editor" (press the "ok" button)
Jun 16, 3:06:55PM @: and then we figure out another way to put things up
Jun 16, 3:07:05PM @: magazines have been done, but not necessarily to death
Jun 16, 3:07:39PM mistawook@gmail.com: Yeah, a decent magazine format with a theme could work
Jun 16, 3:08:12PM mistawook@gmail.com: I just keep thinking of things like Vice and other sites like that, where it's essentially the old E/N site format but with a touch more direction and quality
Jun 16, 3:08:21PM @: vice?
Jun 16, 3:08:24PM @: never heard of it
Jun 16, 3:08:26PM mistawook@gmail.com: Viceland
Jun 16, 3:08:40PM mistawook@gmail.com: http://www.viceland.com/
Jun 16, 3:08:55PM mistawook@gmail.com: They have a print version, but throw everything they have on the site
Jun 16, 3:09:48PM @: not bad
Jun 16, 3:10:55PM mistawook@gmail.com: Yeah, they touch on a lot of neat stuff
Jun 16, 3:14:05PM @: well i will bring it up
Jun 16, 3:14:22PM @: i think it's important we don't fall into the same trap as we did
Jun 16, 3:14:30PM @: cuz it makes the forums fucking boring
Jun 16, 3:15:06PM mistawook@gmail.com: Yeah
Jun 16, 3:15:27PM mistawook@gmail.com: It might also be worthwhile to link any interesting front-page stuff with a thread
Jun 16, 3:15:37PM @: yes
Jun 16, 3:15:41PM mistawook@gmail.com: so as to seed discussion, and point people to the forums
